Skip to main content

A Marriage of Science & Mysticism

Dysikonesia, Aphantasia and a Sophisma: Uncovering a Key to the Minds Mental Mixing Deck.


It occurred to me one day, that taken for their literal meaning only, the psychic concepts of the Seven Clair's and the Daimon, provide handy language framework for all the main mental senses. Clairvoyance, literally means 'clear seeing' or the 'foreseeing light of mind' - the minds vision. This understanding was a very helpful key for me in pondering the differences between people with regards to mental perceptions in the absence of defined language, even if it was not suitable for long-term use. 

Explaining Mental Perception with The Seven Clair's and The Daimon:

  • Vision - Clairvoyance, clarity of thought in vision. 
  • Sound - Clairaudience, clarity of thought in sound.
  • Smell - Clairalience clarity of thought in smell.
  • Taste - Clairgustance, clarity of thought in taste.
  • Touch - Clairtangency, clarity of thought in physical sensation or touch.
  • Emotions- Clairsentience, clarity of thought in feelings or emotion
  • Knowing - Claircognizance, clarity of instant cognition (insight, instinct and intuition).
  • Voice The Daimon - A clarity of the verbalisation of thoughts and feelings.

'Total' Aphantasia and a Sophisma:

The reason why language was needed is because it is lacking. 'Total aphant' is a term used in the aphantasia community but total of what, I am not sure?
1) Does it mean lacking vision and other mental senses that are not vision? Are we only including the 5 physical senses in that and not the other mental senses? If not, why not? What if you lack one or more but not all, are you 'total aphant'? If not, what are you? What is the lack or excess of other senses called? What about those who have mental vision but lack all other mental senses, are they aphantic? 2) Is 'total aphant' 100% no vision? The word aphantasia literally means 'without mental vision', so is it used to define those with aphantasia from those with low mental vision? Why are we calling low visualizers 'aphant', we call high visualizers 'hyperphant', so why not 'hypophant' (low mental vision)? I have aphantasia (no mental vision), with SDAM (Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory) and I am missing many other mental senses beyond vision. With this key I can list all 8 of them with ease, but most importantly, it details what I have.

The term 'total aphantasia' is not useful to describe my experience, the key below, is.


Marrying Science and Mysticism and Finding Appropriate Language:

I discovered the other day that 'yeda' is the scientific word for 'to know', derived from the established psychology term Yedasentience, used to describe the knowing feeling mind. It is perfect for use in this key and it already means what I need it to, even if the current term is inclusive of knowing and feeling. 

The Journal of Social Theoretical Psychology"As it turns out, the actual term “yedasentience” is a combination of the Hebrew word for knowledge or to know (yeda) and the Latin word for feel (sentire)". 

Researchers of abnormal psychology define yedasentience as; "A subjective feeling of knowing. An intuitive signal that you have thought enough, cleaned enough, or in other ways done what you should do to prevent chaos and danger.” 

And according to the interpretation by Reqtest; "Unsurprisingly, researchers have linked poorly developed yedasentience in humans with obsessive-compulsive disorder, which is typically characterised by repetitive behaviour fuelled by a sense of ‘unfinishedness’.

𝐃𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐤𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐚 is the scientific definition for a lack of collective mental senses (8 main senses are known, not all are scientifically defined).

"Dysikonesia... [is when] weak or absent imagery occurs across multiple senses."

I will be using this word as the heading to denote all mental senses, in the interim of science getting the topic pinned (this word and its need is still debated within scientific communities).

The term 'mental imagery' denotes all the imaginary senses, including; 'visual imagery', 'auditory imagery', 'olfactory imagery' etc. This is an established scientific concept and while it is a little confusing, it is the term for the collective imaginary senses.

A Temporary Key to Mental Perception:

Vision/Eye: Visual Imagery - Yedavoyance
To know the sense of mental imagery, e.g. being able to imagine the vision of an apple.
  • Aphantasia (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Hypophantasia (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Phantasia (median or average sense)
  • Hyperphantasia (above average or strong sense)

Sound/Ear:
Auditory Imagery - Yedaaudience
To know the sense of auditory imagery, e.g. being able to imagine the sound of your mothers voice.
  • Anauralia (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Hypoauralia (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Auralia (median or average sense)
  • Hyperauralia (above average or strong sense)

Smell/Nose:
Olfactory Imagery - Yedaalience
To know the sense of olfactory imagery, e.g. being able to imagine the smell of perfume.
  • Aphantosmia (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Hypophantosmia (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Phantosmia (median or average sense)
  • Hyperphantosmia (above average or strong sense)

Taste/Tongue:
Gustatory Imagery -Yedagustance
To know the sense of gustatory imagery, e.g. being able to imagine the taste of wine.
  • Aphantogeusia (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Hypophantogeusia (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Phantogeusia (median or average sense)
  • Hyperphantogeusia (above average or strong sense)

Touch/Skin:
Tactile Imagery -Yedatangency
To know the sense of tactile imagery, e.g. being able to imagine the sense of being touched.
  • Apsychosomatosensation (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Hypopsychosomatosensation (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Psychosomatosensation (median or average sense)
  • Hyperpsychosomatosensation (above average or strong sense)

Emotion/Heart:
Emotional Imagery -Yedasentience
To know the sense of emotional imagery, e.g. being able to imagine the feeling of emotions.
  • Alexithymia (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Apathy (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Empathy (median or average sense)
  • Hyperempathy (above average or strong sense)

Intuition/Gut:
Intuitive Imagery - Yedacognizance
To know the sense of intuition and instant cognition, e.g. "ah-ha" moments, when you "just know".
  • Ametacognition (absent/conceptual sense)
  • Hypometacognition (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Metacognition (median or average sense)
  • Hypermetacognition (above average or strong sense)

Voice/Voicebox:
Intraphonic Imagery - Yedaphonation
To know the sense of intraphonic imagery, e.g. being able to hear your inner voice.
  • Anendophasia (absent/conceptual sense - updated June 2024 for new definition. Originally listed in this key as intraphonation and its variants)
  • Hypoendophasia (lower than average or weak sense)
  • Endophasia (median or average sense)
  • Hyperendophasia (above average or strong sense)

Seems like the logical conclusion that, if you have some sense (low, median or strong), it can be conditioned to be inhibited or enhanced, but if you lack any ability, there is nothing to condition. Senses lost, reduced or increased through illness or injury, may potentially heal.

I think it is safe to now assume that we all have different combinations for the mental senses - 1,020 different combinations, given 4 sets and 8 mental senses, (AI says my math is wrong and it is actually 65,536 combinations for the 4 variations of the 8 senses), let alone the variation of strength and all the other possible senses.  

Click the image below for an interactive link (updated 08/12/24):


To use the key, what are you for the 8? Do you have a conceptual sense, a low sense, an average sense or a strong sense?

Could we also have; to create language and bring the potential total of mental senses up to 42?


Is the above how 'the meaning of life, the universe and everything' is perceived?

Update 08/12/24: Thesis on ResearchGate, here. Join my Reddit discussionshere




Note: Green text denotes hyperlinks to studies. Orange text denotes words related to psychic abilities. Crimson text denotes invented language. Blue text denotes existing scientifically-defined language.


If you are wondering why I made this key, it wasn't an intent, it started with a poem about aphantasia, and grew from there. I have no inner sound at all, but a very strong inner monologue, so I know the voice and ear are different systems. This key exists because aphantasia opened the door to my ignorance and it's not enough to name the lack of 2 senses for me. It doesn't explain all the things I experience, the key does a better job.


Comments

  1. The idea of combining the words is cool. Also did you make this https://www.instagram.com/p/Cm914tdDX4T/ on your insta or is that from another artist? It's really fire and I wanna hear more so if u got a spotify link or something let me know. Also what kind of weird brain stuff do u have. You sound autistic but also like 300 IQ. You remind me of the guy that coded Holy C. Super smart but also super crazy. If you are crazy just know I'm a normal person, not some lizard cia agent or whatever so don't try and come after me. I really just liked the beat u posted and that's why I'm commenting here. I can't even pronounce half the words u typed tbh.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fifteen Types of Mental Imagery and Vividness Ranges

Introduction to the Proposed Framework The new framework that I have presented, designed to help with understanding mental imagery, now includes fifteen distinct modalities (or " yeda's "), each with a range of four variations in strength:  aphantasia, hypophantasia, phantasia  and  hyperphantasia .   This results in a total of sixty variations leading to over one billion possible combinations of mental experiences. This expanded framework offers a deeper insight into the diverse ways our minds perceive and interact with imagery, unlocking a more detailed understanding of the mental senses. Neurodiversity is the norm, we all possess a unique perspective to bring to the table.  It has taken two years and a lot of feedback from the community to be able to articulate the instant " feeling " or " knowing " I had two years ago when I discovered aphantasia and a door was opened—the topic of neurodivergence suddenly " all made sense ", as did a lo...

The Mind’s Eye: A Conversation with Dr. Adam Zeman

Dr. Adam Zeman is a pioneering figure in the study of aphantasia, the inability to produce mental imagery. In a recent discussion with him, I explored the evolving understanding of this fascinating condition, its terminology, and the spectrum of experiences associated with it.  Dr. Zeman defines aphantasia as the lack of mental imagery . Initially, this definition referred solely to visual imagery (or what might be termed visual aphantasia ). Over time, the term has broadened to encompass deficits across multiple sensory modalities, forming what is now referred to as multisensory aphantasia . This includes conditions such as auditory aphantasia (the inability to imagine sounds), tactile aphantasia (a lack of imagined touch), and emotional aphantasia (the absence or reduction of emotional imagery). While we didn’t discuss all the possible senses, I mentioned I am aware that researchers are currently investigating up to 20 modalities. This number wasn’t confirmed during our discu...

#VSS Yedacognizance at Play

I’ve always thought of myself as intuitive. From the moment I learned the word as a child, it felt like the perfect description of the things I sensed before I should know them. One of my earliest memories is a vivid example of this uncanny intuition—what I consider a type of very mild precognition.  It was my last year of Primary School, and the Christmas play was a big event. That year, our tiny village school—with barely 60 students—had splurged on the rights to play the music from  Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat . The excitement buzzed through the classroom as the teachers began announcing the cast.  We were all crammed into the biggest classroom, fidgeting in anticipation as name after name got called. My own name hadn’t been mentioned yet, but as the roles dwindled and with only a handful of us left, a strange and knowing thought crept into my mind: "No. They wouldn’t... Why would you even think that?",  I tried to shake it off, but the feeling I...