Skip to main content

A Transgenic Note

Transgenic mutants are deliberately deformed, disabled and disordered for animal research purposes. We can create human-animal chimeras, put human DNA into every cell of a mouse, make cells glow green with jellyfish protein, just to be sure, but no amount of human DNA in a mouse will turn it into a human.

No matter how much that mouse thinks it might be able to identify with minute aspects of being human, it cannot. It will always be a mutant of a mouse, exploited for biotech gain. Humanized mice do not get human rights. 

Law and language for transgenic animals and other such biotech mutants is important and nomenclature is complex. The breeding, movement and welfare of animals under such procedures must be monitored and regulated for the welfare and integrity of both wild and lab lines. Law and language applies differently to animals outside of laboratories, for good reason. Transgenic mutants are covered by the basic animal welfare laws, but they also have ASPA (1986), that details exceptions and restrictions, due to their augmentation. 

I ran many experiments, some of it was groundbreaking research, what many do not know is that most scientists never see their own research in action, most never enter an animal lab themselves due to containment rules or their locations far from such labs, animal research assistants like me do it. What I ran and then witnessed was emailed as the results for the scientist to interpret. 

There is no line between male or female, between human or animal, between man or machine. Generalizations are necessary, but they are not the rule and they never have been. 

There is no such thing as supermouse, no matter what the tabloids say. Biotech is not the solution people dream in sci-fi movies and books, just take a look at real clones. There is always a trade-off. We live in an interdependent system, a planetary body - the body needs homeostasis, not more mutation.

Mind has no gender. It isn't even limited to your body. It can change with every moment or as a result of drugs, disease, environment and viral memetics etc. You can even lose it with amnesia and dementia - which must be horrific for the transgendered

To add (12/08/24), there are 3 main sex-based categories, one of which we still do not accept, each with their own sub-headings. There are the 2 poles required for human reproduction and the survival of our species, as well as all the variation in between:

  1. Male and all their accepted variations
  2. Female and all their accepted variations
  3. Intersex and all their variations (diagnosed as a result of the accepted definitions of above)
The variation of intersex outside of the two poles (not within), that facilitates breeding, would be species divergence. 

You are born and will die, the same sex. No group can change their sex to become one of the others. However, as intersex individuals may not know their sex until adulthood, and because their biological sex may not be legally recognised, they may identify as male or female. Their sex remains intersex.

It would seem far more appropriate that those who opt for sex-based biotech mutation post-birth, are classified as a form of lab-created intersex mutation, as opposed to the naturally occurring sex-based mutations that develop before birth. This is closer to reality than the insanity we decided to run with. 

No matter what your mind or the media says, you cannot change your biological sex, age or species, no matter how many drugs or surgeries you have, no matter how much you pay the biotech companies or how much they pollute this planet to do it. 

You are born male, female or intersex (a natural and sometimes unnatural occurring mutation, present at birth) and there is no changing that. Disease knows what you are as much as other humans and animals. We are a very long way off being able to create such mutations in living children or adults with biotechnology, at a desire and a price. 

The only way humans can 'change sex' is through the perversion of law and language. It is gaslighting abuse and a form of GBH to deny the realities. We are altering law and language to create this fallacy of a transhuman reality.  

Transhumanism is about conditioning humanity to accept and develop the products, laws and language for our transhuman exploitation. It is in direct conflict with the notion of humanity and is about mutating humans with biotech into something 'other', just as with lab animals. 

If we are to augment humanity with transgenic, transfection and transgender technology in order to create transhumanity, we need law and language that protects the integrity and welfare of both

We need Welfare Guardians that protect the biotech augmented when it goes wrong or when they are exploited against their welfare, these things impact our entire species. Mice get welfare guardians, shouldn't our kids? 

If you're kids want to be lifelong biotech guinea pigs, let them decide at 21. They couldn't run for a government office until then, so why can they decided to be willing volunteers in the experimental augmentation of the human race?

Women birth humanity and are humanities (and currently transhumanities) most valuable asset, especially in a globally aging population

Trans rights are not Human rights, nor should they be, for the health and safety of all. Human rights must be protected, not augmented. 




Comments

  1. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/human-augmentation-the-dawn-of-a-new-paradigm

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Transgender-Transhuman-Manifesto-Freedom-Form/dp/0615489427

    ReplyDelete
  3. The rise of the biocyborg: synthetic biology, artificial chimerism and human enhancement, 2021

    Abstract
    Applying technologies into the human body makes a hybrid human/machine: a cyborg. We identified four types of cyborgs in the literature: the original cyborg, enhanced temporarily for space exploration, the science-fiction cyborg, the “Haraway cyborg” used to critic the dualisms and the “everyday cyborg” who became one by necessity, and learns to live with the implanted technologies. We propose in this article a fifth version: the biocyborg. Such a cyborg presents a new kind of hybridity that we named artificial chimerism, it leads to a multi-scale non-Darwinian evolution and the willingness to become a biocyborg is not only driven by necessity but also by the desire to be enhanced and to push the physiological boundaries of the human body. Becoming a biocyborg comes with new vulnerabilities as any embodied technologies but the associated risk is multi-level and also concerns the human species.

    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14636778.2021.2007064

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fifteen Types of Mental Imagery and Vividness Ranges

Introduction to the Proposed Framework The new framework that I have presented, designed to help with understanding mental imagery, now includes fifteen distinct modalities (or " yeda's "), each with a range of four variations in strength:  aphantasia, hypophantasia, phantasia  and  hyperphantasia .   This results in a total of sixty variations leading to over one billion possible combinations of mental experiences. This expanded framework offers a deeper insight into the diverse ways our minds perceive and interact with imagery, unlocking a more detailed understanding of the mental senses. Neurodiversity is the norm, we all possess a unique perspective to bring to the table.  It has taken two years and a lot of feedback from the community to be able to articulate the instant " feeling " or " knowing " I had two years ago when I discovered aphantasia and a door was opened—the topic of neurodivergence suddenly " all made sense ", as did a lo...

The Mind’s Eye: A Conversation with Dr. Adam Zeman

Dr. Adam Zeman is a pioneering figure in the study of aphantasia, the inability to produce mental imagery. In a recent discussion with him, I explored the evolving understanding of this fascinating condition, its terminology, and the spectrum of experiences associated with it.  Dr. Zeman defines aphantasia as the lack of mental imagery . Initially, this definition referred solely to visual imagery (or what might be termed visual aphantasia ). Over time, the term has broadened to encompass deficits across multiple sensory modalities, forming what is now referred to as multisensory aphantasia . This includes conditions such as auditory aphantasia (the inability to imagine sounds), tactile aphantasia (a lack of imagined touch), and emotional aphantasia (the absence or reduction of emotional imagery). While we didn’t discuss all the possible senses, I mentioned I am aware that researchers are currently investigating up to 20 modalities. This number wasn’t confirmed during our discu...

#VSS Yedacognizance at Play

I’ve always thought of myself as intuitive. From the moment I learned the word as a child, it felt like the perfect description of the things I sensed before I should know them. One of my earliest memories is a vivid example of this uncanny intuition—what I consider a type of very mild precognition.  It was my last year of Primary School, and the Christmas play was a big event. That year, our tiny village school—with barely 60 students—had splurged on the rights to play the music from  Joseph and the Amazing Technicolour Dreamcoat . The excitement buzzed through the classroom as the teachers began announcing the cast.  We were all crammed into the biggest classroom, fidgeting in anticipation as name after name got called. My own name hadn’t been mentioned yet, but as the roles dwindled and with only a handful of us left, a strange and knowing thought crept into my mind: "No. They wouldn’t... Why would you even think that?",  I tried to shake it off, but the feeling I...