The vocabulary for mental perception is expanding. It is satisfying to see the key is holding out as science works to categorize this new frontier:
Aphantasia (Vision/Eye)
"The inability to form mental images of real or imaginary people, places, or things."
Alexithymia (Emotion/Heart)
"Alexithymia is when a person has difficulty experiencing, identifying, and expressing emotions."
Anauralia (Sound/Ear)
"Anauralia is the phenomenon of an absence of auditory sensory imagery - not hearing anything in one's inner ear"
We can now add;
Anendophasia (Speech/Voicebox)
"Recent research introduces 'anendophasia' as a term for the absence of inner speech, revealing that not everyone experiences internal dialogue. The study compared adults with low and high levels of inner speech, finding significant differences in their cognitive abilities."
As stated in prior musing on the topic, I understood these were separate only because I have an inner voice that I 'know' but that I cannot hear. My mind has no sound, sound in my imagination is the same as vision. So from this, just considering those 2 senses, we might infer that you can potentially have;
- Inner Sound and an Inner Voice
- Inner Sound and No Inner Voice
- Inner Voice and No Inner Sound
- No Inner Sound and No Inner Voice.
Anauralia (lack of inner sound) and Anendophasia (lack of inner voice) are divided in opinion scientifically, but like Aphantasia (lack of inner vision), they all come under the heading of Mental Perception.
I am of the opinion it is far too confusing to name the entire topic of mental perception as aphantasia or even multisensory aphantasia, especially now there is growing public understanding about the word regarding mental vision, specifically. The 'A' prefix denotes an absence, but there are those with;
- Aphantasia (lacking or conceptual sense of mental vision)
- Hypophantasia (low or below average sense of mental vision)
- Phantasia (regular or average sense of mental vision)
- Hyperphantasia (high or above average sense of mental vision)
Based on what I hear of others experiences, I would assume that regarding all the mental senses, there are those with a low sense, regular sense and high sense also. E.g;
- Anauralia (lacking or conceptual sense of mental sound)
- Hypoauralia (low or below average sense of mental sound)
- Auralia (regular or average sense of mental sound)
- Hyperauralia (high or above average sense of mental sound)
- Anendophasia (lacking or conceptual sense of mental speech)
- Hypoendophasia (low or below average sense of mental speech)
- Endophasia (regular or average sense of mental speech)
- Hyperendophasia (high or above average sense of mental speech)
- Alexithymia (lacking or conceptual sense of mental emotion)
- Apathy (low or below average sense of mental emotion)
- Empathy (regular or average sense of mental emotion)
- Hyperempathy (high or above average sense of mental emotion)
I feel that the term Dysikonesia or other such word, would be more appropriate as the collective heading for the topic of 'Mental Perception', those lacking all the mental senses listed could then be classified as 'Adysikonesic' (without mental perception), but the key works so far, whatever words we swap in as they get defined, and more importantly, it works to detail what I have. So thank you again to all those in the aphantasia groups who assisted, from this highly Yedasentient and 'Yedacognizant' mind!
And it looks like the scientific community may already be working on defining spatial imagery (listed in the 42 'Yedaspatial'), and potentially, tactile imagery ('Yedatangency') next, as the current headlines on the topic state; "Aphantasia linked to abnormal brain responses to imagined and observed actions."
This sudden understanding of mind is still being categorised by the scientific community, it is exciting to think what we might learn about ourselves and others as our understanding grows!
Or to present it another way...
To know the sense of mental imagery
e.g. being able to imagine the vision of an apple.
To know the sense of auditory imagery
e.g. being able to imagine the sound of your mothers voice.
To know the sense of olfactory imagery
e.g. being able to imagine the smell of perfume.
To know the sense of gustatory imagery
e.g. being able to imagine the taste of wine.
To know the sense of tactile imagery
e.g. being able to imagine the sense of being touched.
To know the sense of emotional imagery,
e.g. being able to imagine the feeling of emotions.
To know the sense of intuition and instant cognition
e.g. "ah-ha" moments, when you "just know".
To know the sense of intraphonic imagery
e.g. being able to hear your inner voice.
I explained how I used the newly scientifically defined words aphantasia, hyperphantasia and anauralia to develop the key, along with the language framework for the '7 Clair's' and the concept of the daimon (inner voice) to create the headings, then found yedasentience had also been defined scientifically previously (the 'knowing' sense), after this, dysikonesia and anendophasia were identified and defined by science also, so these were added to the key and its framework.
Could there one day be technological beings:
- with a simulated sense of yedavoyance, yedaaudience, yedaalience, yedagustance and yedatangency.
- and without a simulated sense of yedasentience and yedaphonation - only a simulated concept of the sense?
Comments
Post a Comment