Update Feb 2025: There is now a dedicated space for this type of discussion off of my poetry blog and over over at: mentalimageryresistance.co.uk Hopefully this clarified advocacy paper makes more sense to people than my ramblings here: Locating Unifying Language: Multiple Intelligences, Mental Sensory Perception, and Mental Imagery . For the Record: I am no authority on this matter. I am an independent researcher and advocate for more clarity in the language and definitions used in mental imagery research. Raising awareness of the need for more research into what those with multisensory aphantasia possess . Dysikonesia, Aphantasia and a Sophisma Uncovering a Key to the Minds Mental Mixing Deck It occurred to me one day, that taken for their literal meaning only, the psychic concepts of the Seven Clair's and the Daimon, provide handy language framework for all the main mental senses. Clairvoyance, literally means ' clear seeing ' or th...
A blog of wild discussion, verse and rhyme relating to the observations of man.
I was reading about how frogs (and humans) see individual photons and reading up on light and it's invisible nature - that it is only perceived when it enters the eye.
ReplyDeleteIt got me thinking, when I 'imagine an apple' I do not see and apple, I would explain it as I 'feel' or 'know' the apple in my mind (feeling and knowing are 2 different types of mental sense). It is like it is there but behind a screen.
I wonder if the reason there is no picture representation is because the memory and subsequent vision is recalled but not perceived because the eye is not involved? Is there something different about the communication between the eye and the brain when storing/recalling memory and information in aphants and non-aphants?
Is our imagination there but invisible? Less a 'Blind Mind' and more 'Photon Thinking' or a 'Quantum Imagination'?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-human-eye-could-help-test-quantum-mechanics