Introduction to the Proposed Framework The new framework that I have presented, designed to help with understanding mental imagery, now includes fifteen distinct modalities (or " yeda's "), each with a range of four variations in strength: aphantasia, hypophantasia, phantasia and hyperphantasia . This results in a total of sixty variations leading to over one billion possible combinations of mental experiences. This expanded framework offers a deeper insight into the diverse ways our minds perceive and interact with imagery, unlocking a more detailed understanding of the mental senses. Neurodiversity is the norm, we all possess a unique perspective to bring to the table. It has taken two years and a lot of feedback from the community to be able to articulate the instant " feeling " or " knowing " I had two years ago when I discovered aphantasia and a door was opened—the topic of neurodivergence suddenly " all made sense ", as did a lo...
A blog of wild discussion, verse and rhyme relating to the observations of man.
I was reading about how frogs (and humans) see individual photons and reading up on light and it's invisible nature - that it is only perceived when it enters the eye.
ReplyDeleteIt got me thinking, when I 'imagine an apple' I do not see and apple, I would explain it as I 'feel' or 'know' the apple in my mind (feeling and knowing are 2 different types of mental sense). It is like it is there but behind a screen.
I wonder if the reason there is no picture representation is because the memory and subsequent vision is recalled but not perceived because the eye is not involved? Is there something different about the communication between the eye and the brain when storing/recalling memory and information in aphants and non-aphants?
Is our imagination there but invisible? Less a 'Blind Mind' and more 'Photon Thinking' or a 'Quantum Imagination'?
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-human-eye-could-help-test-quantum-mechanics