Thinking with Aphantasia

How do people think without a visual imagination?

I would say my imagination is invisible but it is OK, because I have the tools to read it. I have a yedasentient or 'knowing and feeling mind'.

As another form of expression, the Apple Dot video below is a pretty accurate visual representation of how it feels for me to think, without mental imagery - like an artist might use paper or video to represent feelings or concepts that can't be seen. Apple did a pretty good job, even if it wasn't intentional.

I get the feeling when I think, that I sort of 'hold' points of information in my mind space, which is represented by the dots. All the properties and information I know about this point are consciously held in this space.

Using the video as a guide, this is how a visualization session might go for me:

1st dot - "Imagine an apple"- Everything I know about apples is ready to be utilised. 2nd dot -"What colour is the apple?" - I make a choice based on what I know about apples. 3rd dot - "Where is the apple?" - I make a choice based on what I know about apples. 4th dot - "You notice the apples is ripe for eating" - Ok, apple is ripe? 5th dot - "What do you do next?" - Ermm, wonder why I am being asked about apples. You could say I am wondering, what is your point?

It feels like interconnected points of information will sort of join up in my mind space. Unconnected subjects are held separately. I can hold many points at once, all evolving at their own pace. If you asked me to flip a thought on its head or look at it from another angle, I sort of feel my perspective of those points shift, like the video display's visually. Sometimes, these collective points of information join up with other previously unrelated bits of information, as understanding on a topic grows, in sort of 'ah-ha' moments.

I also have an inner monologue and while I don't 'hear it', I know what it is saying and what I sound like as I think, so I can talk to myself in my mind space, about these points.

Comments

Fifteen Types of Mental Imagery and Vividness Ranges

Introduction to the Proposed Framework The new framework that I have presented, designed to help with understanding mental imagery, now includes fifteen distinct modalities (or " yeda's "), each with a range of four variations in strength: aphantasia, hypophantasia, phantasia and hyperphantasia . This results in a total of sixty variations leading to over one billion possible combinations of mental experiences. This expanded framework offers a deeper insight into the diverse ways our minds perceive and interact with imagery, unlocking a more detailed understanding of the mental senses. Neurodiversity is the norm, we all possess a unique perspective to bring to the table. It has taken two years and a lot of feedback from the community to be able to articulate the instant " feeling " or " knowing " I had two years ago when I discovered aphantasia and a door was opened—the topic of neurodivergence suddenly " all made sense ", as did a lo...

The Mind’s Eye: A Conversation with Dr. Adam Zeman

Dr. Adam Zeman is a pioneering figure in the study of aphantasia, the inability to produce mental imagery. In a recent discussion with him, I explored the evolving understanding of this fascinating condition, its terminology, and the spectrum of experiences associated with it. Dr. Zeman defines aphantasia as the lack of mental imagery . Initially, this definition referred solely to visual imagery (or what might be termed visual aphantasia ). Over time, the term has broadened to encompass deficits across multiple sensory modalities, forming what is now referred to as multisensory aphantasia . This includes conditions such as auditory aphantasia (the inability to imagine sounds), tactile aphantasia (a lack of imagined touch), and emotional aphantasia (the absence or reduction of emotional imagery). While we didn’t discuss all the possible senses, I mentioned I am aware that researchers are currently investigating up to 20 modalities. This number wasn’t confirmed during our discu...

A Marriage of Science & Mysticism

Dysikonesia, Aphantasia and a Sophisma: Uncovering a Key to the Minds Mental Mixing Deck. It occurred to me one day, that taken for their literal meaning only, the psychic concepts of the Seven Clair's and the Daimon, provide handy language framework for all the main mental senses. Clairvoyance, literally means ' clear seeing ' or the ' foreseeing light of mind ' - the minds vision. This understanding was a very helpful key for me in pondering the differences between people with regards to mental perceptions in the absence of defined language, even if it was not suitable for long-term use. Explaining Mental Perception with The Seven Clair's a nd The Daimon: Vision - Clairvoyance , clarity of thought in vision. Sound - Clairaudience , clarity of thought in sound. Smell - Clairalience clarity of thought in smell. Taste - C lairgustance , clarity of thought in taste. Touch - C...

Ishtar's Shithouse Poetry

Search This Blog