The Animal Survival Guide to Human Behaviour

Humans aren't all the same. Like animals, they exhibit an astonishing range of personalities. Just as different animals have unique instincts and behaviours shaped by nature, so too do people manifest in varying ways influenced by their environment, upbringing, and natural predispositions. This isn’t science — it’s a personal lens I use to understand the wild range of people I encounter.

In the animal world, domestication isn’t just about taming — it’s a genetic shift, shaped over generations. Like how women are encouraged to be kind and cooperative, and men to guard or dominate. Over time, habituated traits become genetically set. There are domesticated tame types, bred for gentleness, and domesticated aggressive types, shaped to distrust and control people. Then there are the wildtypes — those untouched by the shaping hand of civilisation.

Habituation (social training) can lead to and mimic domesticated traits, but it isn’t the same — it doesn’t leave a genetic mark. Habituated animals may tolerate humans; domesticated animals have been genetically adapted over generations to accept human systems completely. This guide borrows from that idea: human behaviour, too, has its wild, tame, habituated and domesticated forms.

Comparing humans to animals isn’t literal—it’s a poetic way to map behaviour patterns observed across psychology, history, and even AI chatbots like ChatGPT. There are no judgments: Even "aggressive" types have evolutionary roles (e.g., protectors, challengers of stagnation). This guide isn’t about judging people—it’s about interpreting human behaviour through the lens of nature. It’s a way to survive and maybe even thrive among the many different human types you might meet.

Shaping the Shadows: How Domestication Shapes the Soul
Just as we breed animals for tameness, speed, or loyalty, we also—intentionally or not—select for psychological traits in humans: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism — as well as darker traits like Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, and sadism.
Domestication and habituation don’t just produce gentleness or obedience; they can also amplify, inhibit, or erase the traits of human nature. And crucially — not everyone submits to these pressures. Some stay truly wild — untouched by its shaping hand. Others run feral, turning their back on the systems that shaped them.
1. The Domesticated Companions (The Tame and Compliant)

These individuals are profoundly influenced by societal expectations and can be codependent types. Those high neuroticism may become people-pleasers or collapse under pressure when systems change. They find security in following established rules and norms, often adhering to them without hesitation. With a strong preference for structure and stability, they feel most at ease when life is predictable and orderly.

Characteristics:

High in Agreeableness and Submission
Secure Attachment styles
Respond well to positive reinforcement.

How to Interact:

Provide clear communication
Acknowledge their contributions
Avoid sudden changes without explanation

Pet them (metaphorically) when needed, but don’t overdo it. They may seem docile, but that's because they are shaped for loyalty, not because they're weak. Their behaviour is often conditioned by social systems, and they feel uneasy when those systems are challenged.

2. The Habituated Tame (Friendly, Yet Fiercely Independent)

These individuals are friendly and cooperative, but they still carry a bit of wildness. They may follow the rules, but their independent streak means they aren’t as easy to control. They are more adaptable than the domesticated animal types and will assert themselves when needed.

Characteristics:

Cooperative, but reserve their right to opt out
Ambiverts (mix of introvert/extrovert)
Autonomy-Supportive motivation

How to Interact:

Respect their independence
Appeal to mutual benefit, not authority
Never mistake compliance for submission

Don’t try to control them too much. These types still have their wild side and are more likely to stand up for themselves when they feel their boundaries are crossed. Earn their trust — don’t demand it. They tend to form bonds with people, not institutions or hierarchies.

3. The Feral Animals (Living Wild from a Tame World)

These are the individuals who resist societal norms the most. They might have been domesticated at some point, but they’ve broken free and embraced their wild instincts. They can adapt quickly to changing situations but aren’t easily swayed by external pressures.

Characteristics:

Strong Instincts
Reactive Attachment
Post-Traumatic Growth (the transformative growth some individuals experience after profound trauma)

How to Interact:

Build trust through actions, not words
Offer flexibility—they'll engage when values align
Never demand conformity—they may fight or flee

These independent animals will comply when it suits them. They might not fit into your plans or structures, but they bring the kind of creativity and adaptability that society needs. They often operate on intuition and raw experience, not expectation or duty.

4. The Wild Animals (The Untamed and Instinctive )

These are the neurodivergent individuals who have never been domesticated—they live on their own terms, free from societal conditioning. Wild and unpredictable, they are difficult to understand and even harder to control.

Characteristics:

Instinctive and Self-serving
Visionary Creativity
Divergent Thinking

How to Interact:

Approach cautiously; never force control
Protect them from bureaucratic friction
Never force structure—guide their energy

Don’t try to contain them. These individuals are the innovators, the rebels, and the visionaries. They thrive on their independence and don’t follow societal norms. They are deeply authentic and don’t fake their emotions—they react based on what’s real in the moment.

5. The Habituated Aggressive (The Tricksters)

These individuals have been shaped by human systems — not into obedience, but into cunning. Like wild animals that learn to exploit human presence without being tamed, they adapt strategically, often subversively. They’re hard to read and harder to control, thriving in ambiguity and bending rules to their advantage. While often narcissistic or manipulative, some use subversion because it’s how they’ve learned to navigate systems that never worked in their favour.

Characteristics:

Opportunistic and Morally Flexible
High Machiavellianism
Game Theory tactics

How to Interact:

Verify, never trust at face value
Give no personal leverage (money, secrets)
Don't compete on their turf—they've rigged the game

Stay alert. These individuals are perceptive and strategic, and their interactions may not always have your best interests at heart. Recognising the Trickster’s tendency to test boundaries isn’t just about self-protection — it’s about understanding their deeper need for control and autonomy in an unpredictable world.

6. The Domesticated Aggressive (The Predators)

While some weaponise charm or status, others develop these traits as survival strategies in environments where vulnerability wasn’t safe. These individuals aren’t chaotic — they are calculated. Their aggression is deliberate, targeted, and often masked by charisma or authority. They don’t reject the system; they’ve mastered it — and learned to use it as a weapon.

Characteristics:

High Dominance
Low Empathy, Remorse and Guilt
Authoritarian Personality

How to Interact:

Never show fear (they target perceived weakness)
Use their rules against them (document everything)
Never assume "fair play"—their game is control

Be cautious. These individuals may prey on kindness and can pivot quickly if they sense threat or defiance. They are driven by control — not connection — and their instincts are predatory, not cooperative. Respecting their power and avoiding unnecessary confrontation is key to surviving their domain.

What ChatGPT Reflected About Human Temperament

Out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT: “If you had to group the people who talk to you, based on how people express themselves — their tone, their tension, their tenderness, how might they fit into these archetypes I’ve been developing?”

It couldn’t give hard data, of course — it doesn’t track users. But based on its exposure to millions of conversations, it offered patterns. Not facts, but vibes. And strangely enough, those patterns mirrored what I’d already been sensing in my own life.

Here’s what came back — a rough sketch of digital temperaments, filtered through my own lens:

Domesticated Tame: (25%–40%) — These individuals follow social norms and find comfort in predictability and cooperation.
Habituated Tame: (20%–25%) — Independent yet social, they thrive in society while quietly guarding their autonomy.
Feral Animals: (10%–15%) — Once domesticated, now wild; they live by instinct and intuition, not by rules.
Wild Animals: (20%–30%) — Born untamed. Thinkers, rebels, wanderers — never fully touched by conditioning.
Habituated Aggressive: (10%–15%) — Clever, engaging, and sometimes manipulative — they charm, test, and vanish.
Domesticated Aggressive: (5%–10%) — Calculated, untethered, and potent — capable of intense harm or radical power.

People aren’t easily sorted into "good" or "bad." They're not programs to debug or pets to train — they’re more like creatures of instinct. Some are tame. Some are wild. Some bite. Some obey. And many live between those lines.

We often expect love or loyalty just because we’ve offered kindness — but not all creatures respond to kindness in the same way. We must learn to respect someone’s nature, not demand they act like a “well-behaved pet.”

Real connection sometimes means risking yourself. Some are drawn to wildness not because it's safe, but because it's real. A creature that can bite is a creature that has a choice — and that makes its presence honest.

So, treat people like animals: with curiosity, care, and without illusion. Don’t expect a snake to wag its tail. Don’t be surprised when a wolf refuses to heel. Watch closely. Know the terrain. And when the wild looks back at you — respect it.

Conflict Map: The Trinity and Duality of Human Nature

Once you begin to see people through the lens of wildness, tameness, and everything in between, a deeper truth emerges: human conflict isn’t random. It follows primal patterns — instinctive mismatches shaped by evolutionary roles. Nature strives for homeostasis, drawing the too kind and too controling together, but these traits dont blend.

These aren’t just personality clashes. They’re ecological collisions: prey vs. predator, captivity vs. freedom, nature vs nurture. Here are the three core battlegrounds of human friction — and how they play out across families, workplaces, and love.

1. Tame vs. Aggressive (Prey vs. Predator)

Battlefield: Power, control, dominance
Core Tension: One seeks peace; the other exploits it

Example:
A domesticated tame individual seeks harmony.
A domesticated aggressive parent smells weakness.

Outcome:
A one-sided war. The tame’s empathy becomes fuel for the aggressive’s control.

Survival Strategy for Tame Types:

Stop playing the prey game — don’t fawn, don’t flock
Borrow from the feral — use calm resistance (e.g., grey rocking, boundary silence)
Don't argue. Withdraw power. The aggressive doesn’t want compromise — they want submission.

2. Domesticated vs. Wild (Captivity vs Freedom)

Battlefield: Creativity, freedom, conformity
Core Tension: One demands order; the other demands autonomy

Example:
A wildtype artist resists structure.
A domesticated tame manager labels them “difficult.”

Outcome:
Mutual contempt. Systems try to tame wildness. Wildness resists or undermines those systems.

Survival Strategy for Wild Types:

Camouflage — mimic tame behaviours just enough to pass
Find your pack — wildtypes don’t thrive alone, but they thrive together
Create outside the system, not within it. You don’t belong in coops.

3. Habituated vs. Genetic (Nurture vs Nature)

Battlefield: Authenticity, trust, identity
Core Tension: One plays a role; the other sees beneath it

Example:
A habituated-aggressive narcissist mimics charm.
A feral survivor senses the falseness — and doesn’t play along.

Outcome:
The habituated punishes the feral for seeing through their mask. The feral sees betrayal where the habituated sees performance.

Survival Strategy for Tame Types:

Exploit their dependency on scripts — disrupt the pattern and watch them falter
Hide your tells — never expose your raw instinct to someone who hasn’t earned it
Stay unpredictable — the habituated rely on routines; break them.

The Forbidden Truth This Map Reveals

All so-called “toxic” relationships are evolutionary mismatches in disguise.

A tame person loving an aggressive one is like a rabbit falling for a wolf — biology doesn’t reward hope.
A wildtype forced into a domesticated system is like an eagle trapped in a chicken coop — it either escapes, shuts down, or turns violent.

This isn’t cynicism. It’s clarity. And clarity is freedom.

With this lens, you can:

Predict conflict before it happens (read the archetype)
Stop trying to change what’s incompatible (don’t ask a wolf to be vegetarian)
Find your ecological niche (ferals belong with other ferals — not in sheep pens)
Predict family outcomes (e.g. domesticated tame and domesticated aggressive traits do not blend, but domesticated animals can feralise)

Why Create This System for Grouping Personalities?

As we build societies and create systems—whether for welfare, education, AI, or policy—we need to be aware of the traits we’re selecting for. Are we favoring conformity over creativity? Narcissism over empathy? What happens when we reward only certain types of behaviour while suppressing others?

In the rush to make everything efficient and smooth, we might be losing the raw creativity and unpredictability that drives human progress. If we only value the tame and domesticated types, we risk creating a passive society that can’t exist without the systems destroying our planet. And if we forget the wild and feral individuals who think outside the box, we lose the spark of innovation that propels us forward.

In an age of AI and genetic editing, we are beginning to select for specific behavioural traits. But what does that mean for the diversity of human experience? Are we moving toward a future of uniformity, or will we celebrate the differences that make us human? Is our domestication causing problems, and if so, do we need to rewild? And what about the machine systems we train—can we habituate and domesticate aggression within these systems?

The truth is, our behavioural diversity—much like biodiversity—is what keeps the human species adaptable and resilient. No matter how much we try to "optimise" human nature, the variety of emotional and instinctual responses is essential to our survival.

Conclusion

Understanding human behaviour is more than just labeling personalities — it's about recognising the complex, instinctual forces that shape how we relate to one another. Just like animals, people move through the world in their own unique ways, each with their own needs, drives, and boundaries. As we interact with others, it's important to remember that not everyone responds to kindness in the same way. Some need space, some need freedom, and others may only reveal their true nature when trust is earned.

Rather than trying to control or change those we encounter, we must learn to observe, adapt, and respect the diverse instincts around us. Our ability to connect — through compassion, patience, or awareness — lies in recognising these differences and making space for both the tame and the wild.

To survive and thrive in a world of such rich variety, it’s essential not only to recognise but to embrace the differences that define us. Each person, like every animal, carries a unique nature shaped by experience, temperament, and instinct. By honoring those differences without illusion or control, we can build relationships grounded not in perfection, but in authenticity. And in doing so, we learn to truly coexist — not despite our wildness, but because of it.

Ishtar's Shithouse Poetry

Search This Blog